If there is no prior informed consent, if there is no medical need, if there is no prospect of medical benefit

Then the ‘treatment’ – whether exposure to radio-chemicals or other “treatment” – is NOT MEDICINE.

If it is not medicine, why invoke the principles of medicine?

To suck people into thinking reactor radio-chemical emissions are good.

They are not.

Constant refrains of “It’s just like a CT SCan” by nuclear authorities relies upon the assumption
that people are unaware of medical diagnosis and patient consent being mandatory requirements
prior to any medical procedure. Further, a CT scanner has an off switch. The radio-chemical
pollutants falsely alleged to be just like a CT Scan do not have such a switch.

Let’s call reactor emissions what they are – radio-chemical pollution. Inflicting it upon people is not on.

http://www.hss.doe.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/chap2_2.html

http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/03/22/what-they-re-covering-up-at-fukushima/
“Hirose: For example, yesterday. Around Fukushima Daiichi Station they measured 400 millisieverts – that’s per hour. With this measurement (Chief Cabinet Secretary) Edano admitted for the first time that there was a danger to health, but he didn’t explain what this means. All of the information media are at fault here I think. They are saying stupid things like, why, we are exposed to radiation all the time in our daily life, we get radiation from outer space. But that’s one millisievert per year. A year has 365 days, a day has 24 hours; multiply 365 by 24, you get 8760. Multiply the 400 millisieverts by that, you get 3,500,000 the normal dose. You call that safe? And what media have reported this? None. They compare it to a CT scan, which is over in an instant; that has nothing to do with it. The reason radioactivity can be measured is that radioactive material is escaping. What is dangerous is when that material enters your body and irradiates it from inside. These industry-mouthpiece scholars come on TV and what to they say? They say as you move away the radiation is reduced in inverse ratio to the square of the distance. I want to say the reverse. Internal irradiation happens when radioactive material is ingested into the body. What happens? Say there is a nuclear particle one meter away from you. You breathe it in, it sticks inside your body; the distance between you and it is now at the micron level. One meter is 1000 millimeters, one micron is one thousandth of a millimeter. That’s a thousand times a thousand: a thousand squared. That’s the real meaning of “inverse ratio of the square of the distance.” Radiation exposure is increased by a factor of a trillion. Inhaling even the tiniest particle, that’s the danger.

Yoh: So making comparisons with X-rays and CT scans has no meaning. Because you can breathe in radioactive material.”

Since 1945 the big lie of the nuclear industry has revolved around concealing the nature of nuclear emissions.

It is not like a CT scan.

In previous posts I have shown how Pecher demonstated the multiplier effect of internalised Sr** compared to external x. That was 1941!

One Response to “If there is no prior informed consent, if there is no medical need, if there is no prospect of medical benefit”

  1. CaptD Says:

    GREAT POST!
    THEY KNEW IN THE EARLY 40’s that there were health risks, yet they classified everything secret and MADE MONEY…

    What a Nuclear Waste!

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: