The Metabolism of the Fission Products, Hamilton 1942 on.

Unseal a source, unleash a vector of harm in grams and fractions thereof. The danger presented being a function of the substances’ biochemical natures and their rate of radioactivity. It has always been the case that industry is incapable of keeping it’s promise. That breach of promise is the central lesson of nuclear history. The fission products having much greater rates of radioactivity per gram of substance than the fuels and natural decay products in most cases.

The central issue is the inability of nuclear industry to keep its sources sealed. It is the old promise that was never kept and it is quite useless for nuclear industry to play doctor, inflicting its pollution on people on the false excuse that such pollution is a medically justified CT scan, as they do. It is not medical in any sense. It is more than bad PR. Nuke is not emission free. The nature of the emissions are radio-chemical.

The Metabolism of the Fission Products, Hamilton 1942 on.

The individual and regular reports made by Hamilton to the Manhattan Project from 1942 are listed at the DOE Opennet online archive. The following is a post war paper dealing with what was learnt.

http://radiology.rsna.org/content/49/3/325

The Metabolism of the Fission Products and the Heaviest Elements

Jos. G. Hamilton, M.D.

+ Author Affiliations

Division of Medical Physics (Berkeley), Divisions of Medicine and Radiology (San Francisco) University of California

↵1 This document is based on work performed under Contract No. W-7405-eng-48-A for the Manhattan Project and the Atomic Energy Commission.

It is a brief version of material to be published in the Plutonium Project Record of the Manhattan Project Technical Series. Presented at the Thirty-second Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Chicago, Ill., Dec. 1–6, 1946.

Excerpt

An investigation of the assimilation, distribution, retention, and excretion of fission products and the heaviest elements in the rat has been conducted at the Crocker Radiation Laboratory of the University of California. These studies were initiated Oct. 15, 1942, and are continuing at the present time. An extensive survey has been made of the metabolism of twenty different radio-elements. This project has been carried forward by Dorothy Axelrod, M.A., Asst. Prof. D. H. Copp, M.D., Ph.D., Josephine Crowley, A.B., Harvey Fisher, A.B., Ph.D, Henry Lanz, Jr., A.B., Kenneth G. Scott, A.B., L. Van Middlesworth, Ph.D., and the author. During the early phases of the work, we were fortunate in having the advice and aid of Professors I. L. Chaikoff, D. M. Greenberg, and their associates, who assisted the program materially, particularly in the studies with strontium, barium, and cesium. Also with the group, during the war, were Assoc. Prof. Roy Overstreet and Asst. Prof. Louis Jacobson, whose contributions included the radiochemical preparations necessary for the tracer studies. We acknowledge with gratitude the facilities that were extended to us by Prof. Ernest O. Lawrence to do this work in the Radiation Laboratory, the constant advice and encouragement given to us by Dr. Robert S. Stone and his colleagues of the Health Division in the Plutonium Project, the assistance and counsel from Dean S. L. Warren and his staff, the help of the operating crew of the 60-inch cyclotron for the preparation of most of the radio-elements used in these studies, and the cooperation of Profs. W. M. Latimer, G. T. Seaborg, and their associates in providing certain key radio-elements for these studies, notably neptunium, plutonium, americium, and curium.

Introduction and Methods During the early phases of the development of the Plutonium Project, it became apparent that one of the most serious problems to be encountered was the protection of personnel working in this field against the immense quantities of radiation and radioactive materials produced by the chain-reacting pile. The most important hazard that arises from the release of nuclear energy are radiations produced directly from fission and subsequently emitted by the resultant fission products and plutonium. The fission products can produce injury either as an external source of radiation or, if they gain entry into the body, by acting as an internal radioactive poison, quite analogous to radium poisoning. This latter consideration is a major concern, since the amounts required within the body to produce injurious effects are minute compared to the quantities necessary to induce damage by external beta and gamma irradiation.

A comparison with the history of the radium industry gives an index of the magnitude of the problem presented by fission products and plutonium to the medical protection program of the Plutonium Project.

OK is everybody clear on that?

IN relation to fission products and plutonium when internalised (within) in the body, the amounts needed to inflict harm are ‘MINUTE’ in physical amount. Source: Manhattan Project contract W-7405-eng-48-A, 1942, Joe Hamilton.

I wonder why it is that Dr. Busby has to take so much flak for merely repeating this information.

Hamilton has not yet been found to be wrong. No corrections have ever been issued by nuclear authorities responsible for the information.

If the physical amounts of internalised radionuclides required to produce harm are “minute”, what does that say about the measured external dose in Sieverts as an indicator of harm on its own?

Its not an indicator at all. It is merely a crude measure of either absence or presence of internalisation hazard.

3 Responses to “The Metabolism of the Fission Products, Hamilton 1942 on.”

  1. CaptD Says:

    More *Nuclear Baloney (NB)
    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Nuclear+Baloney

  2. Aaron Datesman Says:

    This:

    “Its not an indicator at all. It is merely a crude measure of either absence or presence of internalisation hazard.”

    is brilliant. It should be inscribed on many tombstones.

  3. nuclearhistory Says:

    Thanks Aaron. It’s just the result of my Army training. Part of my job was to look for radon progeny flecks in the lab. Any reading on the scintillator meant cleanup. Didnt matter where the needle was. So long as it indicated a fleck. I used the meter like one would use a metal detector. That was in the old days. The 70s. So the credit goes to my trainer, my Captain.

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: