Email traffic 8 Why the Action on behalf of Aboriginal Australians was dropped – theories by Anon.

Touche !

Scenario 1: the Cth A-G’s told the ALRM board to drop it as outside the “manual” of ALS services able to use Cth $ – for purely domestic cost-cutting same as cutting single mothers’ pensions for the dole for single mothers;

Scenario 1a: the Cth A-G’s told the ALRM board to drop it as outside the “manual” of ALS services able to use Cth $ because Britain required them to do so as a condition to allow Australia on the Security Council of the UN to use the UK African embassies as Australian diplomatic missions;

Scenario 2: the ALRM board freely decided to drop it as outside the “manual” of ALS services able to use Cth $ to earn supposed brownie points with the Cth A-G’s;

Scenario 2a: the UK Hickman & Rose advise and report was negative on causation and time limitation as a ruse to get out of the obligations of a solicitor to ALRM as the client after H&R learned that ALRM board had sacked the ALRM Director who alone had engaged H&R as UK solicitors for ALRM & ALRM board freely decided to drop it as outside the “manual” of ALS services able to use Cth $ to earn supposed brownie points with the Cth A-G’s;

Scenario 2b: the UK Hickman & Rose advise and report was negative on causation and time limitation to end the obligations of a solicitor to ALRM as the client after H&R learned that ALRM board had disapproved of H&R’s legal engagement and then because of this had sacked the ALRM Director who alone had engaged H&R as UK solicitors for ALRM, & ALRM board was unable to proceed without a UK solicitor to brief UK pro bono counsel.

Scenario 3: ALRM board had no advice that there was a reasonable prospect of success from either an external or in-house source after it terminated its former Chief Counsel and offered him an administrative position only as a lackey to the board as Director of Legal Services.

Scenario n (where n = any number of alphanumeric combinations of 000aaa to 999zzz)

end quote.

I see. So the UK government does not feature overtly at all.

But it was darn good “weeding” job none the less, where considerations about “appropriate use ” of Aust AG $ = don”t upset the Poms.

Paul


%d bloggers like this: